Sunday, February 5, 2012

An appearance in Diet regime Fitness ? Article Directory Site

Lots of people currently are very significantly aware of their own health along with fitness. In addition to that, these people, and many others at the same time, have become obtaining which want to develop their to ahieve that magazine-cover search. Consequently, fitness gyms, schools along with other gyms get grown popular across for you to cater to the requirements of your fitness fans and also afficionados.

Even in the media trainers, weight loss goods, and other devices to further improve health and fitness have an overabundance of or a smaller amount acquired treatments for the particular airwaves generating their own way into the particular homeowners. But exerise isn?t the best way to create that system stunning. In addition, it entails certain quantity regarding accountability about the foods 1 selects to consume. Becoming healthy requires one to view eating habits conditioning.

Diet plan health and fitness is really as essential as workout itself. Eating habits to keep fit provides the important diet one needs to restore worn-out muscle tissue and for balanced growth. Diet regime physical fitness will not be assumed. With all the popularity of preserving good health, many different opinions, approaches, applications along with dieting strategies happen to be formulated by many people professionals. Among these are usually higher carbo diets and high body fat diet programs. Whih you are more effective and what type need to 1 decide to comply with?

Right off the bat to learn will be the fundamental differences between both of these diet approaches. Because the identify implies, high carbohydrate diets focuses on taking in carbohydrate-rich food items while higher fat diet plans encourages fat-rich foods. Large carbohydrate diets are employed to glycogen saved in the actual liver organ and muscles. Glycogen can be a blood sugar sophisticated that delivers a lot of one?s set to be used inside anaerobic workouts.

Fat, on the other hand, is actually well-nown to be your most wealthy method to obtain calorie consumption. This process contains Two.Five times far more calorie consumption when compared with carbs and meats the same. Scientific studies furthermore show that it takes the body Twenty four energy to be able to process sugars although it only requires Three or more to lose down body fat. Thus what type to follow along with? A person might consume a high carbo and also low-fat conditioning diet regime or even the some other means close to. It really is definitely not recommended to adhere to both simultaneously; until if you want to obtain excess fat.

However eating habits physical fitness just isn?t about shedding fat, you need to also take into account his diet in order to keep body fat aside. Research indicates that sustainable loss of weight is only able to be performed dieting that matches the individual meals choices, lifestyle, health-related report along with satisfied alerts.

Eating plans around can assist you shed off excess weight, but only one particular eating habits may help you keep sexy, and it?s also the one which satisfies an individual nearly all. Other crucial sides of needing a match diet regime are generally moderateness, stability along with variance. You have to do not abandon essential nutrients as well as other materials necessary for healthful system performing. health organizations are evident regarding the levels of nutrients an individual must have within the body.

Low fat higher carbs, higher cabohydrate supply reduced fat; now you ask , not really which in turn diet system works out there however which is it that will work for you. Striving for an attractive along with balanced entire body won?t have for you to burden an individual, diet fitness doesn?t need for you to suggest sticking with the same kind of meals for life. One may actually play the role of ambitious and try out there fresh meals available. That knows? one may also discover kale exciting.

Source: sinus pressure relief

Source: http://list-of-directory.com/business/home-based-business/an-appearance-in-diet-regime-fitness/

adrian peterson darlene love free kindle books roasted potatoes turkey recipes turkey recipes happy holidays

Saturday, February 4, 2012

Buy Flint River Ranch Pet Food It's So Good | Mix Dog.org

If you?re who owns an exotic canine, you?ll undoubtedly wish to appear at specifically what the various food choices are. Because you could be aware, a couple of massive quantity of world wide web web sites that provide Flint River Ranch pet food for the browse. Getting got that taken care of, you should be certain that no matter what food you do give your dog, it can be efficiently designed because of the specifications. All in all, it takes place to be inside welfare if you plus your pet to find out up to it can be feasible to pertaining to Flint River Ranch pet food ahead of generating a acquire determination.?Learn more about a Pediatric Nurse Salary here.

You will discover many world-wide-web web sites that provide Flint River Ranch pet food that?s undoubtedly ideal for the pet. Nonetheless, you?ll want to make particular that it really is the suitable food for your pet. The truth is probably the most crucial thing that you simply must be concerned about is always that food will absolutely vary in 1 variety of pet to a distinct. Whenever you may be employing a bird, the reality inside the make any distinction could be the reality that cockatoo dogs could have distinct wants. Taking into consideration this prepare related with believed, it really is typically ideal that you get your hands on your point of view of an animal medical practitioner. Get all the info you need here.

An additional thrilling approach for you to know what form of Flint River Ranch pet food is perfect is always to build relationships with different other pet masters. This may well moreover allow you to assemble any option web sites are excellent with regards to choosing Flint River Ranch pet food. Ordinarily linked with flash you could observe that puppies are most likely to be straight into fruit together with insane in addition to pests also. Because they are going to be successfully taken from his or her organic habitat, there should be the optimal Flint River Ranch pet food, which would supply all of them the appropriate combination of vitamin supplements, dietary fiber and nutrients. Overall, make sure that regardless of what get you noticed acquire can be a that is well-known along with encouraged by basically different other proprietors also. Get more than your fill of information on this subject here.

Nevertheless whilst the majority of these food may be befitting practically all domestic pets, it is best to detect no matter if it really is proper or possibly your pet. That is why it is an excellent idea which you collect greatest wishes guidance from the reliable vet. This way you possess an peace of thoughts which you just cannot deny at any time over time. Last but not least, you will need to see just what the expense is with regards to receiving Flint River Ranch pet food. The incredibly truth using the make a difference is you will discover in season special discounts which are on give when selecting Flint River Ranch pet food. Nevertheless, what you should watch out for is no matter if or not these savings are shown simply mainly because the expiry date is nearby.

?

Source: http://www.mixdog.org/1126/buy-flint-river-ranch-pet-food-its-so-good/

bret michaels bret michaels the unit bob weston david wilson bill obrien reggie mckenzie

Panetta report fuels concerns that Israel will attack Iran

Jacquelyn Martin / Pool via Getty Images

U.S. Defense Secretary Leon Panetta speaks with reporters Thursday in Brussels, Belgium, after the conclusion of a day of meetings with fellow NATO defense officials.

By Robert WindremNBC News

Concerns that Israel will attack Iran in an attempt to prevent Tehran from developing nuclear weapons escalated Thursday when the Washington Post reported that Defense Secretary Leon Panetta believes there is a ?strong likelihood? that Tel Aviv will launch such an offensive in April, May or June.?

U.S. Defense Secretary Leon Panetta has warned of a pending attack this spring, and said the U.S. has expressed its concerns to Israel. NBC's Brian Williams reports.

"No, I'm just not commenting," he said when asked about the report, adding, "What I think and what I view, I consider that to be an area that belongs to me and nobody else."

?

Panetta?s reported view has been echoed in recent interviews by NBC News with current and former U.S. and Israeli officials who have access to their countries? intelligence. Those officials, all of whom spoke to NBC News on background, estimated the odds of an Israeli attack on Iran as better than 50-50.


Most of the officials said it is highly unlikely that the war-weary U.S. would mount a military attack on Iran, instead relying on financial sanctions and diplomatic pressure to squeeze Tehran.?

But Israel, which has an openly hostile relationship with Iran and much more at stake if its neighbor becomes a nuclear power, is more of a wild card, say the officials, who come from a variety of intelligence and national security backgrounds. But the officials warn that, if intelligence indicated that Iran was on the verge of building a nuclear weapon, the government of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu would almost certainly consider a military strike. And if it decided to launch one, the U.S. would likely receive very little advance notice, they say.?

Here, in question-and-answer format, is a summary of how the officials see such an attack unfolding:?

Q: What are the chances Israel attacks Iran?

?

A: Officials agree the chances for an Israeli attack on Iran are at least 50-50, maybe higher. More than one former official has suggested the possibility is as high as 70 percent, but events can move that higher or lower. One said he is ?worried sick? about it.

??

Q: When might Israel attack??

A: Most of those questioned said the prospects of an Israeli attack will increase as the calendar moves into spring and summer.?

Q: What assets would Israel use??

A: Many of those interviewed claim Israel would launch a multi-pronged attack, using its fighter bombers as well as its Jericho missile force.

?

Israel has both medium and intermediate range Jerichos. The medium-range Jericho I would not have the range to reach many Iranian targets ?but the intermediate-range Jericho II?s, capable of hitting targets 1,500 miles away, would have no problem.? The Jerichos would be equipped with high explosives, not nuclear warheads. Asked if the Jericho would have the accuracy and the explosive power to take out a hardened bunker of the sort believed to be protecting Iran?s most-sensitive underground nuclear facilities, one official replied, ?You would be surprised at their accuracy? and that the high explosives involved is a special mix of chemical explosives that could conceivably penetrate the Iranian fortifications.

Missile attacks would be coordinated with fighter-bomber attacks (presumably? the Israelis? extended-range F-15I Strike Eaglet) as well as drone strikes. The fighter bombers would use what one official described as ??high-low, low-high? flight paths -- high first to increase fuel efficiency, then low for most of the trip to evade radar, then climbing high again as the weapons are released in what is known as a ?flip toss? on the target.? The Israelis would be prepared to lose aircraft if necessary, the officials said.?

The Israelis are not planning to use submarine-launched cruise missile force -- ?not enough of them,? one official said of the subs. (The Israelis have long had nuclear tipped sub-launched cruise missiles as part of their deterrent force.)

??

Q: How would other Middle Eastern states react??

??

A: U.S. officials believe that Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates would support the attacks because of the threat Iran poses to them.

?

The Saudis and Emiratis, both of which have Sunni controlled governments, have repeatedly lobbied the U.S. to bomb the Iranian nuclear facilities, preferring a U.S. attack to an Israeli one. But because both are desperate to have someone take out the Iranian program, they also have shared information with the Israelis. If Israel did decide to attack, it?s likely Israeli jets would overfly Saudi territory and would even be allowed to perform aerial refueling. An attack would take at least two midair refuelings.

?

As for Turkey, it may not participate at the same level as the Sunni Arab Gulf states, but it is watching Iran closely. The U.S. fears Turkey would consider a nuclear weapons program if Iran obtained them and could develop nuclear weapons much more quickly than either Saudi Arabia or the UAE.

Q: Would there be a ground component??

A: Not in a traditional way. Some officials have suggested that Israeli commandos, either from the Israel Defense Forces or Mossad (or both), would be inserted on the ground near targets to illuminate them, gather post-strike forensics and perhaps grab some materials for later analysis.?

Q: What would Israel?s goal be??

A: Israel would not try to take out every Iranian nuclear facility but instead would target certain facilities it considers critical, hoping to set the program back. U.S. officials believe an attack could put the program back two to four years, Israelis estimate more like three to five. One official said the Israelis are prepared to ?do the same in two to four years? if the Iranian program recovers.??

?

Q: How successful might the attack be??

?

A: Iran has fortified its critical underground nuclear facilities with as much as 30 meters (nearly 100 feet) of reinforced concrete, including the centrifuge cascades at Natanz and Fordow outside Qom.? Israel however has dramatically improved its bunker-busting capability over the past three years.?

Israel is unlikely to bomb ?soft targets? within the Iranian nuclear program, including labs inside universities or near civilian centers, say U.S. officials. That?s because they are hoping that a clean strike would show that Israel only wants to take out nuclear facilities dear to the mullahs and Revolutionary Guards, both of whom who they believe to be wildly unpopular with the Iranian people.

?

Q: How might Iran respond??

?

A: As the New York Times reported Friday, the Israeli military intelligence assessment is that Iran?s military response to such an attack would be muted, in part because of its limited capability and in part because of it understands a massive attack would be met with massive response. Not everyone agrees with that assessment, noting that Iran has had years to plan out their response. The biggest fear is that Iran would unleash Hezbollah, which has between 42,000 and 48,000 missiles and rockets in southern Lebanon aimed at Israel. Even before any attack, officials in both Thailand and Azerbaijan say they have recently thwarted Hezbollah plots against?Israeli facilities.?

Israel understands that Hezbollah may respond on behalf of Iran following an attack and is prepared to go after Hezbollah ?and not stop at the Litani River (the northern limit of most previous Israeli attacks) this time nor limit its force to a brigade or two? as one U.S. official put it.? Another added that Israeli officials understand that ?Israeli blood, Jewish blood will certainly be spilled? in attacks around the world in the event of an attack.? And the response might not be immediate. One official noted that the Saudi Hezbollah attacks on Khobar Towers in 1996 took place months after the U.S. passed tighter sanctions against Iran.?

But another notes that the level of Hezbollah support for Iran in such a scenario is an enormously important ? and difficult -- question for both Israel and the U.S.? Hezbollah?s ?position is precarious, as Syria -- its main conduit for Iranian supplies ? is wracked by violence and its main focus has shifted to governance in Lebanon. Most officials think Hezbollah won?t be able to sit this one out, but few expect a massive response against Israel, which would engender a counterattack by Israeli forces.?

There are other possibilities.? One Iranian says to watch Dubai where 400,000 Iranian expatriates work.? Iranians could ?shut it down,? the official said.? All the officials note that Iran has had a long time to plan its response.?

One huge question is what the Iranians would do if they believed that the Saudis or Emiratis were helping Israel.? In that case, say U.S. officials, expect Iran to respond against the southern Gulf States and, if the attack is serious enough, expect the United States to move to protect the Saudi Kingdom in particular, expanding the theater of combat.??

?

Q: What is the worst-case scenario for the U.S.??

?

A: The worst case in case the Israelis attacked Iran would be if the Iranians judged the U.S. had been implicated or involved in the attack. Senior Iranian officials have in the past told NBC News that they would make no distinction between an Israeli attack and a U.S. attack. They see the two working hand-in-hand.?

If that happened, presumably the scope of Iran's retaliation would encompass the U.S. At the far end of the spectrum, they might go an ?embassy-a-day program, start blowing up U.S. missions in various cities,? said one former U.S. official. But another intelligence official said such a response would be highly unlikely, noting that even a single embassy attack would mean massive U.S. retaliation. The Iranians also could ?attack ships of the U.S. Fifth Fleet in the Gulf or U.S. allies on the Arab side of the Gulf, but either of these responses would likely prompt a U.S. military response aimed at toppling the regime in Tehran, the official said.?

?

Q: What about oil??

?

A: The price would spike immediately, going from around $100 a barrel now to ?between $200 and pick-a-number,? said one oil trader.? How quickly it would revert to lower levels would depend on how quickly the situation stabilized and how and where Iran would respond.? An attack on Saudi Arabia, for instance, would place the price target at close to that ?pick-a-number? scenario, the trader said.?

Even a $25 a barrel increase would have serious consequences for the recoveries in U.S., European and East Asian economies, particularly Japan.? ?It would be a game changer,? for the U.S. economy and the political season, said a U.S. official.??

?

Q: Why would Israel launch such an attack???

?

A: Putting aside Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad?s inflammatory comments that Israel should be ?wiped off the face of the Earth? (which some Iranians claim privately was a mistranslation), some Israeli officials believe the continuous threat of an Iranian nuclear weapon would lead as many as 200,000 of their best and brightest citizens to leave for the United States and other Western nations. That is the ?existential threat? Israeli officials worry about, not that Iran could destroy Israel.

An Iranian nuclear weapon would give Israel a lot less latitude to respond to Iranian threats, the Israelis believe.???

?

Q: Beyond military considerations, what else might the Israelis take into account when timing of an attack??

A: It may seem cynical, but some in the Middle East think an attack could be timed to the U.S. presidential election. Some in Middle East believe that Israel might carry out an attack at the peak of the U.S. campaign in the belief that candidates and other elected officials in both parties would compete to show their support for Israel.

Robert Windrem is a senior investigative correspondent for NBC News; NBC News Pentagon correspondent Jim Miklaszewski and Pentagon producer Courtney Kube also contributed to this report.

Source: http://openchannel.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2012/02/02/10303860-panetta-report-fuels-concerns-that-israel-will-attack-iran

tower heist reviews recursion amy schumer amy schumer ascii art ascii art

Friday, February 3, 2012

Petition is pushing for Pluto postage stamp

This concept art for a 2015 stamp celebrates NASA's New Horizons mission to Pluto.

By Alan Boyle

The next three years just might be prime time for poor little Pluto, thanks to NASA's New Horizons mission ? and?if the?leaders of that mission are successful,?a brand-new Pluto postage stamp will be part of the celebration. But they need your help.

Today marks the start of an online petition campaign?at Change.org, calling for the creation of a stamp commemorating the $700 million mission and its 2015 Pluto flyby. It would mark only the second time the dwarf planet has appeared on a U.S. postage stamp. The first time was in 1991, when a 29-cent stamp labeled Pluto as "Not Yet Explored."


Back then, some planetary scientists saw that stamp?as a challenge ? and that gave an early boost to the efforts that eventually led to New Horizons' launch in 2006. The mission's principal investigator, Alan Stern of the Southwest Research Institute, even included one of the old stamps as a pint-sized payload on the spacecraft.?Now the postal connection is coming full circle, just in time to render that "Not Yet Explored" label obsolete.

"We're asking people to sign the petition because the post office considers not just the merits of a new stamp proposal, but also whether it is supported by a significant number of people," Stern said in today's kickoff announcement. "This is a chance for us all to celebrate what?American space exploration can achieve through hard work, technical excellence, the spirit of scientific inquiry and the uniquely human drive to explore."

USPS

The 1991 stamp was part of a solar-system set.

The petition, along with the?formal stamp proposal,?would be sent to the U.S. Postal Service's Citizens' Stamp Advisory Committee, which sifts through thousands of suggestions?and?recommends which?subjects?should be transformed into commemorative stamps. Last year, for example, one set of stamps paid tribute to Mercury astronaut Alan Shepard's?history-making?flight in 1961, as well as the Messenger mission to Mercury.

It takes about three years to?move from the?submission of a proposal?to the issuance of a new stamp ? which is why Stern and his colleagues are making a big push now for a stamp that would be unveiled in 2015. The more signatures they can get, the better the chances?of?winning the?approval of the committee and the postmaster general.

"If we get 10,000 signatures, we'll get a stamp ? that's the impression I get," Stern told me. "But we're aiming for 100,000."

Stern?said he'd like?to turn in the signatures as well as the stamp proposal during the week of March 13, which marks the 82nd anniversary of the announcement of Pluto's discovery. That's not entirely out of the question, even though the International Astronomical Union reclassified Pluto as a dwarf planet in 2006. After all, how many other celestial bodies have been the subject of letter-writing campaigns, legislative action, street protests?and petitions by planetary scientists?

Dan Durda, an artist and space scientist at the Southwest Research Institute whose?works appear on the?New Horizons website and in many other places (including my book, "The Case for Pluto"), has drawn up a concept for the Pluto stamp ? but if the stamp proposal is approved, the stamp's design may well be out of his hands.

"Stamp designing is an unusual art form requiring exacting skill in portraying a subject within very small dimensions," the Postal Service says. "Due to the demands of stamp design and reproduction requirements, it is our policy not to review nor accept unsolicited artwork."

The?design?isn't uppermost in Stern's mind right now. "You know, I'm sure it will turn out fine," he told me. "Our goal is to commemorate the historic?nature of the mission and celebrate U.S. leadership in space exploration. And involve the public."

That's where you come in.

"Sign the petition, and mention it on Facebook," Stern said. "Let's see how high we can drive the numbers for Pluto and for space exploration."


Alan Boyle is msnbc.com's science editor. Connect with the Cosmic Log community by "liking" the log's Facebook page, following @b0yle on Twitter or adding Cosmic Log's Google+ page to your circle. You can also check out "The Case for Pluto," my book about the controversial dwarf planet and the search for other worlds.

Source: http://cosmiclog.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2012/02/01/10284883-petition-pushes-for-a-pluto-stamp

spear of destiny rock hill sc kate middleton pregnant national book awards jessica sutta sexiest man alive 2011 ruben studdard

Thursday, February 2, 2012

'They use you up': Hall of Famer Dorsett suing NFL (AP)

The helmet-to-helmet shot knocked Tony Dorsett out cold in the second quarter of a 1984 Cowboys-Eagles game, the hardest hit he ever took during his Hall of Fame NFL career.

"It was like a freight train hitting a Volkswagen," Dorsett says now.

"Did they know it was a concussion?" he asks rhetorically during an interview with The Associated Press. "They thought I was half-dead."

And yet, he says, after being examined in the locker room ? a light shined in his eyes; queries such as who sat next to him on the Cowboys' bus ride to the stadium ? Dorsett returned to the field and gained 99 yards in the second half. Mainly, he says, by running plays the wrong way, because he couldn't remember what he was supposed to do.

"That ain't the first time I was knocked out or been dazed over the course of my career, and now I'm suffering for it," the 57-year-old former tailback says. "And the NFL is trying to deny it."

Dorsett traces several health problems to concussions during a career that lasted from 1977-88, and he has joined more than 300 former players ? including three other members of the Pro Football Hall of Fame, and at least 32 first- or second-team All-Pro selections ? in suing the NFL, its teams and, in some cases, helmet maker Riddell. More should have been done in the past to warn about the dangers of concussions, their lawyers argue, and more can be done now and in the future to help retired players deal with mental and physical problems they attribute to their days in the NFL.

In interviews conducted by the AP over the past two months with a dozen plaintiffs, what emerged was, at best, a depiction of a culture of indifference on the part of the league and its teams toward concussions and other injuries. At worst, there was a strong sense of a willful disregard for players' well-being.

"It's not about whether players understood you could get a concussion playing football. It's about the negligence of care, post-concussion, that occurred," says Kyle Turley, an offensive lineman for the Saints, Rams and Chiefs who was the No. 7 overall pick in the 1998 draft and an All-Pro in 2000.

Players complain that they carried owners to their profits, in an industry that now has more than $9 billion in annual revenues, without the safety nets of guaranteed contracts or lifetime medical insurance.

"Yeah, I understand you paid me to do this, but still yet, I put my life on the line for you, I put my health on the line," Dorsett says. "And yet when the time comes, you turn your back on me? That's not right. That's not the American way."

Head injuries are a major topic of conversation every day of the NFL season. With the Super Bowl as a global stage, the NFL will air a one-minute TV commercial during Sunday's game highlighting rules changes through the years that have made the sport safer.

The owners of the teams playing for the Lombardi Trophy in Indianapolis ? Bob Kraft of the New England Patriots and John Mara of the New York Giants ? acknowledge the issue's significance.

"There's more of a focus on it now, without question, and I think that's a good thing, and I think it'll continue to be a focus. Because none of us want to put players in perilous situations like that," Mara says. "I don't want to see guys that are on this team, 20 years from now, with debilitating injuries, no matter what they are."

Says Kraft: "We know this is a physical game, and when people play the game, they know it comes with certain risks. We have tried to stay ahead of it."

The most accomplished and best-known plaintiff in the flurry of lawsuits ? a star for the Cowboys after winning the 1976 Heisman Trophy at Pittsburgh ? Dorsett agreed to two interviews with the AP, one over the telephone and one at his suburban Dallas home.

"I don't want to get to the point where it turns into dementia, Alzheimer's. I don't want that," says Dorsett, who ran for 12,739 yards, the eighth-highest total in league history. He is, in that moment, sad and deflated ? in others, pumped up and angry, fists flying to punctuate his words. "There's no doubt in my mind that ... what I went through as a football player is taking an effect on me today. There's no ifs ands or buts about that. I'm just hoping and praying I can find a way to cut it off at the pass."

He spreads two pages' worth of brain scans on his coffee table and says doctors told him that red regions in the color-coded scan mean he is not getting enough oxygen in the left lobe of his brain, the part associated with organization and memory. He already forgets people's names or why he walked into a room or where he's heading while driving on the highway, and fears his memory issues are getting worse.

Dorsett's had surgery on both his knees, and problems with his left arm and right wrist. He says then-Cowboys coach Tom Landry once told him he could play despite a broken bone in his back. Not even the flak jacket Dorsett says he wore beneath his jersey could bring relief, the injury so painful that "tears would just start flowing out of my eyes, profusely and uncontrollably" during practices.

"They would see me and just point to the training room. `Go to the training room, get some ice and heat and come on back out here,'" Dorsett says.

And during games?

"They were hitting me, and I'd be squealing like a pig," Dorsett says, imitating the guttural sound. "It was so bad that the other team was telling our coaches, `Get him out of the game.' You know that something's wrong then. And like a fool, I stayed as long as I could. They're going to our sideline, telling our coaches, `Get him out of the game!' ... You know it's bad when the opposition feels sorry for you."

Other players describe an off-camera NFL that is darker than the carefully scripted show presented during Super Bowl week. Their recollections, based on playing careers that touched every decade from the 1960s to the 2000s, include:

? "Midnight snack" buffets at a team hotel the night before games that would consist not only of food and drink, but also painkillers so that, as Rory Graves, an Oakland Raiders offensive lineman from 1988-91, puts it, "The next day, you feel like a kid. You could run into a car ? no pain! You didn't feel nothing."

? Cans of beer tucked into airplane seat pockets before players would board, so they'd have something at the ready to wash down the prescription drugs such as the painkiller Vicodin (commonly called "footballs" by players because of their oblong shape) or the muscle relaxant Flexeril ("home plates" because they're pentagons) disbursed freely by someone coming down the aisle on team flights. "We took those drugs because we wanted to play, but there was nobody stopping us," Turley says. "We're young. We're 10 feet tall. Nothing can harm us. If you're giving it to us, we're going to take it."

? Widespread and regular use of Toradol, a medicine intended for pain relief, generally after an operation, and a central part of one of the lawsuits that says the drug could put someone with a head injury at increased risk. "If it wasn't torn or it wasn't broken, to me, Toradol fixed it and allowed me to keep going. I was so used to using it that I wanted to make it a weekly ritual to make sure that if I did get hurt, I wouldn't have to be taken out of the game," says Joe Horn, who estimated he got four or five concussions during a career in which he caught more than 600 passes for the Chiefs, Saints and Falcons from 1996-2007. "To be honest with you, we were kind of ? what's the word for it? ? addicted. But I always thought it was OK; the NFL doctors were giving it to us."

? Being scorned by teammates or coaches if unable to return to a game because of injury, and a seeming total dismissal, particularly in the 1970s, 1980s and 1990s, of the notion that head trauma could cause significant problems, immediately or long term. "Get back out there" was a phrase repeated by the ex-players, citing words they heard during practices or games. As Joe Harris, a linebacker with five teams from 1977-82, says: "I know I had nine or 10 concussions, because I played through them. A lot of times, I'm out there and I was dazed, and I heard guys say, `He's knocked out, and he don't even know it.' And then you talk to your coach, and they bring out smelling salts. `Give him a hit of that, and put him back out on the field.' And they show you fingers, and you say it's three when it's two. And they say, `Get back out there. Just hit the one in the middle.'"

? A day-to-day, post-football existence that is difficult because of, for some, depression, dementia, migraine headaches, memory lapses, along with balky hips and knees and shoulders. "My body hurts all the time," says Mark Duper, who caught more than 500 passes as a wide receiver with Dan Marino's Miami Dolphins from 1982-92. Duper is more concerned, though, about the ringing in his ears, the loss of memory, "having a conversation and, all of a sudden, I just forget what I'm talking about."

"I try not to take medicine. I don't want to be a zombie," Duper adds. "What little left I've got in my brain, I want to keep it normal."

Dorsett describes making the trek to the annual Hall of Fame induction ceremony and being saddened by once-hearty men deteriorating before his eyes.

"Bodies that were just mangled, just beat up. Twisted up. Hit with arthritis and the knuckles and the bones, the twisted bones. It's `Wow!' It's very enlightening to see that," he says, wincing at the images he describes. "And then when you hear that these guys don't have insurance, that the league won't give them insurance, that the league is saying that it didn't happen on their clock. That's bull."

Citing the pending litigation, NFL spokesman Greg Aiello said the league would not comment on players' specific allegations and referred to a written statement initially released in December: "The NFL has long made player safety a priority and continues to do so. Any allegation that the NFL intentionally sought to mislead players has no merit. It stands in contrast to the league's actions to better protect players and advance the science and medical understanding of the management and treatment of concussions."

Jack Yeo, who works at a public relations firm representing Riddell, said the equipment company does not comment on legal matters.

As public as the plight of current players is, former players say their stories aren't widely known.

"Fans don't know. They have no clue. And you think the NFL is going to tell them? No," says Ronnie Lippett, a Patriots cornerback from 1983-91. "I'm just so happy that the senators and congressmen and congresswomen took notice of how they have been cheating us. And that's the only reason (players are) getting the help that we're getting now. And it's only been in the last two years that anything has started to change."

Soon after a House hearing in October 2009, when lawmakers grilled Commissioner Roger Goodell about the league's concussion policies and the connection between injuries on the playing field and later brain diseases, the NFL made several changes. Those included revamping return-to-play guidelines and changing the co-chairmen of its committee on concussions ? a panel, originally formed in 1994, that one pending suit against the league describes as "part of the NFL's scheme to deceive Congress, the players and the public at large."

The league finds itself continually changing its concussion protocols, most recently after Cleveland Browns quarterback Colt McCoy returned to a December game despite not being checked for a head injury following an against-the-rules hit to the helmet. The league put certified athletic trainers in booths above the field to watch for injuries and added video feeds on sidelines to make it easier to track dangerous hits immediately.

But players like Dorsett and Duper, who played long before that greater awareness and vigilance, didn't have such safeguards.

"They weren't as cautious back then. We played with concussions. I didn't know what a concussion was, really, when I was playing football. We got hit, we got up," Duper says. "I can remember times when I got hit, and I went back out on the field, and I couldn't remember the plays. I guess that's what a concussion is, the `Eeeeeeeeeeee!' you'd hear. And you woke up and you'd see stars. I remember those things. And I played with it."

Says Barry Brown, a linebacker and tight end for three teams from 1966-70: "When you know you've got a concussion, and they put you back in the game, it's abuse."

That attitude extended beyond head injuries, according to the plaintiffs the AP interviewed.

"The game of football and the money that was out there ? they wanted the best players in the games, no matter what. If he was 80 percent well or 75 percent, they believed that he, the starter, was better than the second guy behind him, and they'd rather have a less-percentage guy. They didn't protect us at all," Lippett says. "I took shots in my foot, in my shoulders, in my ribs. They had to know of the ramifications of going back out there with different injuries. The money aspect of it just forced them to not pay attention."

Mara, the Giants' owner, says he can't speak for other teams, but insists his medical staff takes "any kind of injury seriously."

"They don't let players go back on the field unless they feel they can do so without risk, particularly with head injuries," says Mara, whose family founded the Giants in 1925. "Our trainer, Ronnie Barnes, has been with us forever. You ask any of our players, or former players, whether he put their interests first or the team's interests first, and I think you'd find a pretty strong consensus that he always put the players' interests first. I can't speak to other organizations."

Giants long snapper Zak DeOssie's father, Steve, also played for New York, as well as New England, during his 1984-95 career. The elder DeOssie was approached about signing on as a plaintiff against the NFL but hasn't because, he says, "I'm not 100 percent sure if my concussions have affected me."

"You accept the responsibility and you accept the idea that you're in a dangerous profession, but you also expect certain levels of care and professionalism on the other side. And I think it's a lot better now than it ever was before," says Steve DeOssie. "Whether it's through public pressure, or whether it's their own desire, they've gone a long way to make it right, which is a good thing."

Players have differing motives for suing their former employers, and the 20 or so lawsuits against the NFL seek varying remedies, although lawyers are reluctant to discuss specific monetary damages. At least one suit, for example, asked that the NFL and Riddell fund a medical monitoring program that would test players over the years to see whether they wind up with problems that stem from concussions.

"I just want to make sure there is some recognition given to the fact that, 10 years from now, if I come down with something ... that I have some kind of recourse," says Cedric Brown, a safety for the Tampa Bay Buccaneers from 1976-84. "I don't want to end up, 10 years from now, being a vegetable, and you've got nowhere to go."

Asked what advice he'd give current players, Brown says: "First thing is, wear every pad. ... And pay attention to your body. When you get to be 50 or 60, those little injuries you have now, guess what? They're coming back."

Dorsett acknowledges he's not familiar with details of the lawsuit that includes him among the plaintiffs. He was approached about joining other former players, and he agreed, figuring his name would call attention to the issues of mistreatment he sees as being at the heart of the case.

"I'll stand up on a mountaintop," Dorsett says, "and tell the world it's not right."

Ask Dorsett what outcome he hopes for, and he speaks about money and principles.

"The owners need to own up to it, own up to what the game does to human lives. There's a zillion football players in the same situation with their brains, their backs, their knees. Come on. They just need to own up to it, and do something about it. They've got money they can put in funds to take care of guys when they need to help," Dorsett says. "We need health insurance for life. Paid by the NFL. No question in my mind, we definitely need that."

According to the NFL Players Association, full lifetime medical insurance was not sought by current and former union leadership because such a plan would cost an estimated $50 million a year and the current U.S. health care laws should cover most players with pre-existing conditions.

"Until the public realizes what's going on and how many players ? there's guys in the Hall of Fame; in the Hall of Fame! ? that were making $300, $400, $500 a month with no health insurance. Again, what is that? That is sad. That is sad," says Dennis Harrah, a Los Angeles Rams offensive lineman from 1975-87 and an All-Pro in 1986. "They're just fallen heroes. You take care of fallen heroes. Somehow, some way."

For now, the lawsuits are still in the initial, procedural stages. On Tuesday, at least four, including one in which former Chicago Bears Super Bowl-winning quarterback Jim McMahon is a plaintiff, were consolidated in a Philadelphia court.

Harrah, like most of the former players interviewed by the AP, isn't all that optimistic about a quick resolution. "They're just waiting until we die," he says of the NFL. "They're just waiting for us old guys until we pass ? to quit complaining, and we die."

That same sense of resentment and despair permeates Dorsett's words as he raises his voice and shakes his head.

"They use you up. No matter what the circumstances are, it's all about winning games, football games, regardless. And they don't care, because they figure, you know, `We got, you know, replacement factories,' which are colleges. And there's going to be somebody else to eventually come along and fill that void," he says. "So they just put you out there, and feed you to the wolves. And if you make it through, fine. If you don't, that's fine.

"Management, ownership, as far as injuries are concerned, I think in some regards they wish they could just look the other way."

___

AP National Writer Nancy Armour reported from Chicago and Indianapolis; AP Pro Football Writer Howard Fendrich reported from Washington, D.C., and Indianapolis; AP National Writer Martha Irvine reported from Frisco, Texas. AP researcher Judith Ausuebel contributed to this report from New York.

___

Follow Nancy Armour at http://www.twitter.com/nrarmour

Follow Howard Fendrich at http://twitter.com/HowardFendrich

Follow Martha Irvine at http://twitter.com/irvineap

Source: http://us.rd.yahoo.com/dailynews/rss/topstories/*http%3A//news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20120202/ap_on_sp_fo_ne/fbn_the_hardest_hit

muhammad ali pentatonix nicki minaj barbie doll nicki minaj barbie doll black dahlia drew drew

Report: UN team did not visit Iran's nuclear sites (AP)

TEHRAN, Iran ? Visiting U.N. inspectors did not visit any of the country's nuclear sites, Iran's official news agency reported Tuesday, concentrating instead on talks with officials.

IRNA quoted an unnamed Iranian official as saying the team of experts from the International Atomic Energy Agency conducted negotiations with Iranians and did not visit the sites where uranium is being enriched. He said the talks were held in a "positive and constructive atmosphere." The report did not elaborate. There was no comment from the U.N. team.

Tension has been building over Iran's nuclear program. The U.S. and its allies charge that Iran is using its uranium enrichment facilities to produce material for nuclear weapons.

Iran has declined to abandon its enrichment labs, saying it seeks to operate the reactors only for energy and medical purposes, not for making weapons.

The IAEA team arrived Sunday on a visit set for three days. An Iranian official indicated it could be extended, but a report from the semi-offical Fars news agency Tuesday indicated the talks were over.

Mohammad Karamirad, a member of the influential parliamentary committee on national security and foreign policy, told the Isna news agency Tuesday that the visit by the IAEA team showed Iran has had "comprehensive and honest cooperation with the agency."

Karamirad said, "The visit can be beginning of new round of talks with the West, and it proves the peacefulness of Iran's nuclear activities."

Iran has been trying to display cooperation with the team and downplay expectations of a confrontational atmosphere during the visit, which began Sunday.

A group of Iranian students staged a silent gathering Tuesday to protest the visit by the U.N. nuclear inspectors, Isna reported.

The report said a group of students gathered at the gate of the country's atomic agency. It did not say how many participated in the brief protest, which was dispersed by Iranian police.

The demonstrating students said they were worried the visit would lead to assassination of Iranian nuclear experts.They charged that U.S. and Israeli agents used information leaked by the U.N. agency to target Iranian nuclear scientists.

On Sunday about a dozen Iranian hard-liners carrying pictures of slain nuclear expert Mostafa Ahmadi Roshan gathered at Tehran airport to protest the visit. Roshan was killed in a brazen daylight assassination when two assailants on a motorcycle attached a magnetic bomb to his car in the Iranian capital. Iran blamed Israel, the U.S. and Britain.

Source: http://us.rd.yahoo.com/dailynews/rss/iran/*http%3A//news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20120131/ap_on_re_mi_ea/iran_nuclear

chuck pagano touch nitrous oxide rihanna thug life tattoo greg kelly patrick witt joe namath

Wednesday, February 1, 2012

Super Bowl rivalry offers big win for travelers

Jim Young / Reuters

A boy runs past a mural Jan. 30 set up as part of the festivities in advance of Super Bowl XLVI in Indianapolis. The New England Patriots will play the New York Giants in Super Bowl XLVI on Feb. 5.

By Rob Lovitt, msnbc.com contributor

The battle for the Vince Lombardi trophy won?t begin until the New England Patriots and New York Giants face off in Super Bowl XLVI on Sunday, but the contest over bragging rights has already begun.

And a lucky family of four could be the big winner.

On Monday, Boston Mayor Thomas Menino and New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg announced their support of their respective hometown teams with a contest offering a ?Super Bowl Super Tour? to the other?s city based on the game?s outcome.

If the Patriots win, the winning Boston family will receive roundtrip airfare to New York, a two-night stay at the Grand Hyatt New York, dinners at B. Smith?s and the Russian Tea Room and free tickets to a variety of sporting events, cultural venues and tours.

If the Giants win, the winning New York family will receive roundtrip airfare to Boston, a two-night stay at The Ritz-Carlton, Boston Common, dinners at Legal Seafoods Harborside and Top of the Hub and free tickets to a variety of sporting events, cultural venues and tours.

Not surprisingly, perhaps, Mayor Bloomberg brought a little New York attitude to the occasion: ?I know the Giants are going to win next Sunday and bring home the trophy,? he said in statement.

Mayor Menino, on the other hand, sounded a more sportsmanlike note: ?I have a lot of faith in the Patriots. They carried us this far and I hope they?ll carry the Vince Lombardi Trophy right back to Boston.?

Both teams will have their work cut out for them. On the one hand, the Patriots are three-point favorites for this weekend?s game in Indianapolis. On the other, the Giants were 12 1/2-point underdogs in 2008 but beat the Pats 17?14. With kickoff scheduled for 6:30 p.m. ET, fans will have to wait until late Sunday night to know who is crowned world champion.

As for the Super Bowl Super Tour, the wait will be even longer. Depending upon the outcome of the game, the winner will?be determined at a later, as-yet-unannounced date.

Alas, entry in the contest will be restricted to residents of Boston and New York. Given the legions of fans in nearby cities and suburbs who will not be eligible, we suspect there will be plenty of sore losers whoever wins in Indy.

More stories you might like:

Rob Lovitt is a longtime travel writer who still believes the journey is as important as the destination. Follow him at Twitter.

?

?

Source: http://overheadbin.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2012/01/30/10273151-super-bowl-rivalry-offers-big-win-for-travelers

when will ios 5 be released when will ios 5 be released ipod nano watch ipod nano watch dancing with the stars elimination dancing with the stars elimination nexus prime